Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) – Utah is the man you may know best as the senator who is trying to persuade the U.S. Government to take legal action against the BCS – the system used to determine college football’s national champion. You may also be interested to know that the Justice Department is now looking into whether the system violates antitrust laws.
Ridiculous, I know.
First of all, let me give you some information about Hatch. He’s a Utah state Senator. Hmm…I do remember a college football team that went 13-0 just last year but didn’t play in the BCS National Championship game. Hatch couldn’t possibly be lobbying on behalf of his own state’s university, could he?
Actually, yes.
I bet you don’t know that Hatch has done this before. The IRS mistakenly released a confidential tax filing showing that pharmaceutical companies and the pharmaceutical industry’s lobbying group wrote $172,500 in checks to the Utah Families Foundation. What is the Utah Families Foundation, you ask? It’s the charity that Hatch helped start, and the same charity that has filed taxes illegally for almost 10 years, according to the Washington Times.
Oops.
Now is an appropriate time to also point out that the industries main lobbying group also paid Hatch’s son Scott to be its lobbyist in Washington D.C.
Now, it appears as though Hatch wants money again – this time on behalf of the University of Utah. After all, he didn’t speak up when Boise State went undefeated in 2006, or when Hawaii ran the table in 2007, or when TCU, Cincinnati and Boise State were perfect in 2009. But as long as Utah can grab a few extra bucks, it’s all good.
Sounds like an honest guy to me.
But for those of us who like the BCS system, we need not worry. Hatch will probably be supporting the system by the end of the week. That is, if his actions are anything like his stance on polygamy, where he first supported polygamists, then was later on record condoning it. He flip-flopped on the issue. I call that the “classic John Kerry move.”
So if all of you hopeless playoff optimists want to trust this guy to bring a “December/January/in general” Madness to college football, go ahead. I’ll continue to have my doubts.
So now the Justice Department wants to see if the system violates antitrust laws. Well, as far as I can tell, there is competition. Some competition (the SEC), is just worlds better than other competition (Mountain West, WAC).
Hey Justice Department – I have a law you can investigate. How about the “we’re only undefeated because Tulsa dropped a wide open pass” law. Or the “we know we have a week conference schedule, but we still schedule division 1-AA teams to come play us at home, then only beat them by 18 points” law. Oh, and look into the “we gave up 35 points against Louisiana Tech, 34 against Fresno State and 33 against Nevada, but we know we could hold Florida, Alabama and Texas to single digits” law. Yes, I’m talking about the 2009 Boise State team, the only other unbeaten team besides Alabama.
The key for these teams is scheduling four very difficult games out of conference, knowing you should get eight wins in the conference. Then maybe they’ll have a chance to play for a championship. A lack of antitrust laws didn’t keep the Broncos, Warriors, Bearcats, Horned Frogs or anyone else from reaching the title game. Poor scheduling, and poor play even in some of the wins kept them out.
If you’re happy with the Justice Department looking into this, then you must not care about the war that Obama refuses to get us out of, the bailout that is putting the country further in debt or the inevitable tax increases to come. If this is such a serious issue, then why hasn’t it already been addressed? If the BCS was illegal, it could not have possibly lasted this long.
Does the regular season mean anything? According to Hatch, the answer is no. A playoff system likely means 9-3 teams have a chance to win it all. And how would the seeds be determined? I’m guessing they would use…ah…the BCS rankings. I can see it now: the playoff system takes the teams ranked 1-8, then a senator from the state the school ranked #9 is from writes a letter to Congress saying it’s not fair. Then the playoff expands, as it does in every other sport, and all of a sudden teams are playing games during finals week, on Christmas Day, in January once classes start and on into February, where the championship is played on Valentine’s Day.
Sounds good to me.
Not.



